Chernysheva L.A., Zaporozhets O.N. Digital Platforms and Urban Mobilizations: How Locality Redefines Connective Action. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2023. No. 4 (176). Pp. 124–148. https: ... Chernysheva L.A., Zaporozhets O.N. Digital Platforms and Urban Mobilizations: How Locality Redefines Connective Action. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2023. No. 4 (176). Pp. 124–148. https:// doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.4.2352. (In Russ.)ISSN 2219-5467DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2023.4.2352ÐÈÍÖ: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54493024Posted on site: 19.08.24Òåêñò ñòàòüè íà ñàéòå æóðíàëà URL: https://www.monitoringjournal.ru/index.php/monitoring/article/view/2352/1813 (äàòà îáðàùåíèÿ 19.08.2024)AbstractThe paper focuses on local digital platforms (citizen media) and their involvement in urban negotiations and conflicts. It aims to revise connective action theory, which describes mobilizations that occur online or both online and offline around a broad political agenda (e.g., Occupy and Indignados movements). The paper explores how applying connective action theory to local mobilization campaigns updates the theory, making it more sensitive to the diversity of connective actions and thus more applicable to empirical research. The paper proposes a typology of connective action based on two criteria: 1) the extent to which a single digital platform dominates the campaign; and 2) the division of responsibility and agency between the initiative group, which acts as the manager of online platforms (groups), and the subscribers. Based on data collected from three studies of local grassroots campaigns conducted in 2018–2020 in large Russian cities (Samara, Novosibirsk, St. Petersburg, and Moscow), four types of local connective action are highlighted and described. Content (in russ)hide table of contentsshow table of contents