Institute of Sociology
of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Dokholyan S.V. Socio-economic development of Russia: analysis of the impact of external shocks and structural constraints on the standard of living. Bulletin of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2025. Vol. 31. No. 5. Pp. 211-222.



Dokholyan S.V. Socio-economic development of Russia: analysis of the impact of external shocks and structural constraints on the standard of living. Bulletin of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2025. Vol. 31. No. 5. Pp. 211-222.
ISSN 1991-6639
DOI 10.35330/1991-6639-2025-27-5-211-222
РИНЦ: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=83161960

Posted on site: 18.12.25

 


Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the paradoxical dynamics of the standard of living of the Russian population in the period from 2014 to 2024, characterized by serious macroeconomic shocks and active government intervention in the social sphere. Objective: The purpose of the study is to identify the causes of the discrepancy between the trajectories of stagnating real incomes of the population and the officially declining poverty rate. Methodology: The study is based on a systematic analysis of data from the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) on income, expenses, poverty and inequality, as well as on a review and synthesis of current scientific papers by Russian economists and sociologists. Results: The analysis revealed that the decline in real disposable incomes in 2014-2020 was due to external shocks and structural features of the economy. It was revealed that the subsequent unprecedented decrease in the official poverty level was caused not by an organic increase in well-being, but mainly by large-scale targeted social payments to families with children and specific economic factors in 2022-2024. At the same time, the high level of inequality (the Gini coefficient) continues to act as a structural barrier to improving the quality of life of the majority of citizens. Conclusions: It is concluded that the existing model of social policy in Russia effectively copes with the task of statistical relief of extreme poverty, but does not solve the fundamental problems of the labor market, such as the phenomenon of the "working poor" and low labor costs. This masks the stagnation of real wealth and preserves structural imbalances in the economy.