Institute of Sociology
of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Shevchenko I.O. (2026) University staff motivation factors. RSUH



Shevchenko I.O. (2026) University staff motivation factors. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies” Series. P. 96-105. DOI: 10.28995/2073-6401-2026-2-96-105
ISSN 2073-6401
DOI DOI:10.28995/2073-6401-2026-2-96-105
РИНЦ: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=91881318

Posted on site: 13.10.26

Текст статьи/выпуска на сайте журнала URL: https://www.rsuh.ru/upload/main/vestnik/fsi/Vestnik_fsi_2(2026).pdf (дата обращения 13.10.2026)


Abstract

The study presents the results of the research in university teachers and the university sta labor motivation and attitude to work. F. Herzberg’s two-factor model was used to analyze labor motivation.For all employees, remuneration is in the rst place in terms of importance. This is a socio-hygienic factor, the primary importance of which indicates tension in terms of basic needs and the fact that the majority of respondents are not satis ed with its size and accrual rules. 62,5% of the teaching sta and 74,3% of the administrators indicated the need for an increase in wages.Younger employees are signi cantly more dissatis ed with the salary level and work organization than the older generation. The teachers of the oldest age group mostly speak about their complete satisfaction with the university and all the motivation factors, because they have already realized their professional ambitions.Interesting and creative work is the second most important thing for the teaching sta , and the atmosphere and team are the second most important for the administrative sta . Satisfaction with professional work is higher among the teaching sta than among the administrative sta . The same is established for satisfaction with the university as a place of work. In general, teachers feel in their place more than administrators do.


↑